China just made Trip.com pay hotels back.
China's market regulator fined Trip.com 5.2 billion yuan, made it refund the deposits it withheld from hotels, and barred it from forcing them into exclusive deals — something no Booking or Expedia fine in the West has ever done
by Markus Busch
Driving the news. On Saturday, July 25, China's market regulator ordered Trip.com to refund 122 million yuan in booking deposits it had withheld from hotels — and hit it with a far larger penalty on top. The State Administration for Market Regulation confiscated 1.658 billion yuan it called illegal gains and levied a 3.521 billion yuan fine, together 5.2 billion yuan, about $765 million. The fine alone equals 7.5 percent of Trip.com's 2025 domestic sales. The regulator called the conduct an abuse of dominant market position, six months after it opened the case in January. The case began with complaints from hotels: that Trip.com dictated their terms and drove their prices down.
What the abuse looked like will read familiar to any hotelier who sells through an OTA. Since 2020, the regulator found, Trip.com used its traffic-allocation algorithms and platform rules to push hotels into exclusive deals and to demand they post their lowest rates nowhere but Trip.com. List a cheaper price on another channel and your ranking dropped. otb walked through that machine in January, when it was still a probe. On Saturday a government ruled it illegal and put a number on it.
Trip.com accepted the ruling "sincerely and resolutely," and promised changes it did not specify.
What it means for hotels. Read the order, not the fine. A regulator made the dominant booking platform stop demanding exclusivity, let hotels price freely across channels again, and hand back deposits it had been sitting on. The platform was holding hotels' own money — guest deposits routed through its system — and releasing it on its own schedule, until the state made it stop. For a small hotel, that money is payroll and suppliers: earned, and parked in someone else's account until the platform decides otherwise.
Now look at your contracts. Parity pressure, the ranking penalty for going cheaper direct, the platform deciding when your guest's money reaches your account — all three are running in your market this morning, and no one has been fined for any of them.
Fines have landed in the West. Spain's competition authority hit Booking.com with a 413-million-euro penalty in 2024; Brussels named it a gatekeeper and forced it to drop parity clauses. That money went to the Spanish treasury. No European or American action has ever made an OTA write a check back to a hotel. China just did.
The catch. This is China's regulator, China's market, and China's platform. It sets no legal precedent in Brussels or Washington, and a GM in Split or Santa Barbara has nothing to point to. Beijing didn't do this for hotels either — it's cracking down on price wars among its own internet giants, and hotels happened to be the ones bleeding. And Trip.com hasn't said what it will actually change, so for a Chinese hotel next week, this is still a promise on paper.
Chinese hotels got their deposits back this weekend. The clause that squeezed them is still in your contract, and still legal.
Enjoying this analysis? Hospitality.today delivers daily insights on hotel distribution, AI trends, and travel commerce — straight to your inbox. Subscribe for free at Hospitality.today →